agendas urbanas intersetoriais em quatro cidades de são paulo intersetorial urban agendas based on four cities in são paulo
Clicks: 193
ID: 241988
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
193 views
37 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #45 of 88 articles by views in carbon letters
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Este artigo visa analisar o processo de implementação e avaliação de projetos de melhoria da qualidade de vida, do ponto de vista dos gestores municipais brasileiros, que têm buscado alternativas para a prática da gestão local. Optou-se por identificar a percepção de gestores, representantes do poder executivo local, prefeitos, secretários de governo e coordenadores, identificados como atores-chave importantes na implementação de projetos de melhoria da qualidade de vida em quatro municípios do Estado de São Paulo/Brasil. Foram feitas entrevistas individuais e em profundidade, com roteiro semi-estruturado. A análise dos quatro projetos por melhoria de qualidade de vida na cidade mostra que o processo de municipalização e descentralização da gestão, que vem sendo impulsionado no Brasil, vem contribuindo para definir uma política local mais autônoma, para criar novas instâncias de decisão, incorporando práticas de controle social e de democratização da gestão. Porém, ainda existem muitas limitações no que se refere à incorporação da avaliação, como elemento retro-alimentador, no planejamento das ações e da prática participativa.
This article is designed to analyze the process of implementing and evaluating projects to improve quality of life, based on the view of Brazilian municipal managers who have sought local management alternatives. It was chosen to identify the perception of managers, representatives of local executive authorities, municipal secretaries and coordinators, all identified as key players in implementing quality of life improvement projects in four cities in the State of São Paulo/Brazil. Individual in-depth interviews were carried out using a semi-structured guide and comparative analysis. The analysis of the four projects aiming at improving quality of life in the city shows that the management decentralization processes, which are currently encouraged in Brazil, have contributed to define a more autonomous local policy and create new decision-making foro, incorporating social control practices and management democratization. However, there are many limitations regarding inclusion of assessment as a feedback to planning actions and participatory practice.
This article is designed to analyze the process of implementing and evaluating projects to improve quality of life, based on the view of Brazilian municipal managers who have sought local management alternatives. It was chosen to identify the perception of managers, representatives of local executive authorities, municipal secretaries and coordinators, all identified as key players in implementing quality of life improvement projects in four cities in the State of São Paulo/Brazil. Individual in-depth interviews were carried out using a semi-structured guide and comparative analysis. The analysis of the four projects aiming at improving quality of life in the city shows that the management decentralization processes, which are currently encouraged in Brazil, have contributed to define a more autonomous local policy and create new decision-making foro, incorporating social control practices and management democratization. However, there are many limitations regarding inclusion of assessment as a feedback to planning actions and participatory practice.
| Reference Key |
mendes2004sadeagendas
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Rosilda Mendes;Cláudia Maria Bógus;Marco Akerman |
| Journal | carbon letters |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0104-12902004000100006
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.