collective review: media, black on white

Clicks: 6
ID: 241760
2002
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #727 of 729 articles by views in molecules

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 729 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
There is a difference between ordinary scientific essays and introductory text books. While we may (and usually do) just scan the contents of the first, we are supposed to read the latter from the first to the last page. If the text follows the history of scientific thought, it may thus seem reasonable to expect a narrative structure similar to the one of bourgeois novel. The text should, in other words, show some kind of plot, linking a poor beginning to a better end. According to this "frame," the end of the story should be able to justify preceding intrigues, torments and struggles as well as the reader's continuous effort to understand what it all was about. As a matter of fact, BONFADELLIs book (volume I) about "Theories and Fundamentals for Analyzing the Effects of Mass Media," though ordered chronologically, is very far from that kind of narrative and might more adequately be compared to postmodern literature. In each chapter of his book, the author presents theoretical approaches to "The Effects of Mass Media," from ALLPORT and LARZARSFELD to the most recent quantitative research efforts in the field. The reader will not get, however, an idea of "what it all was about." The author accurately eliminates any reference to history—that is, about personal, political and theoretical contexts of the theories he is writing about. He even destroys the object of his study, quoting theories about "effects" on "behavior," naming scientists that seek for "effects on social action," or "effects through social action," for "constructions" or studies on "interaction with media." BONFADELLI certainly does name them all, but he does not make any effort to fit them together. But what if this kind of conceptual dissolution really was the most adequate narrative strategy in order to expose a certain concept of empirical science? The second volume of BONFADELLIs work examines research traditions of applied research on topics such as violence in the media, political campaigns and advertising. Both volumes of this work on "The Effects of Mass Media" may be useful to someone who is looking for orientation about single schools of thought or for bibliographical references. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0204127
Reference Key
seiffarth2002forum:collective Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Achim Seiffarth
Journal molecules
Year 2002
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/817
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.