地方法院實施「案件流程管理」制度對於妥速審判之回應──以臺灣新竹地方法院刑事審前中心為例 district court implement case flow management system responded to properly and speedy trial ─ centred on taiwan hsinchu district court criminal pretrial center
Clicks: 30
ID: 241511
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
8.7
/100
30 views
13 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #11 of 12 articles by views in fokus konseling
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
本文試圖跳脫傳統詮釋論之法學方法,以量化及質性研究之法學實證研究方法,並利用平衡計分卡(BSC)分析法院推行「刑事案件流程管理」制度,在財務、顧客、內部程序及學習成長等四構面之因果關係,嘗試建構推行新制之願景與策略,再經由策略地圖結合關鍵績效指標(KPI)之展開,逐一分析法院試辦「案件流程管理」制度之成效,是否達到各項預設之關鍵績效指標。並以研究結果提供司法院精進此制度成效之參考,盼能推行全國一體實施,回應民眾對於妥與速之審判要求,以提升信任度,並營造法官合理審判環境,以共創雙贏。
This article attempts to jump off the traditional interpretation on the Law changed to the Law of empirical research to quantitative research and qualitative research, and use the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) to analyze the court the implementation
of case flow management system in the financial, customers, internal processes and learning and growth the causal relationship of the four dimensions, try to construct a vision and strategy of the implementation of the new system, combined with the commencement of key performance indicators (KPI) through strategic map, to analyze the court “Criminal case flow Management” the effectiveness of the system, can achieve the various preset KPI. And results provided to the Judicial Yuan for the future extend into a system of reference. This article and
hope that the introduction of a national and universal implementation in response to the public “properly with the speed of the trial” requirement (trust enhancement),
and to create a reasonable judge trial, in order to create win-win.
| Reference Key |
chiou2013kj
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;邱忠義 Jong-Yi Chiou |
| Journal | fokus konseling |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.3966/181130952013061001005
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.