o mal-estar na modernidade e a psicanálise: a psicanálise à prova do social the discontent in modernity and psychoanalysis: social-proof psychoanalysis
Clicks: 255
ID: 240652
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
255 views
29 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #30 of 89 articles by views in applied catalysis b: environmental
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
O artigo tem a intenção de indicar a presença de dois discursos teóricos opostos em Freud, no que concerne às relações entre sujeito e modernidade. Pretende-se demonstrar que na sua segunda versão, desenvolvida em Mal-estar na civilização, o discurso psicanalítico realizou uma crítica sistemática de sua versão inicial, esboçada em "Moral sexual 'civilizada' e a doença nervosa dos tempos modernos". Pela construção dos conceitos de desamparo e de mal-estar, o discurso freudiano colocou então a psicanálise à prova do social. Além disso, indica que aquela pôde construir uma leitura sobre a modernidade, ao lado das que foram realizadas por Weber e Heidegger. Finalmente, esse percurso tem ainda a finalidade de pensar a crise da psicanálise na atualidade, nas novas condições do mal-estar na modernidade.
The article aims at showing the presence of two opposing theoretical discourses in Freud, in what concerns the relationship between the subject and modemity. It intends to demonstrate that in its second version, developed in Malaise dansia civilisation, the analytical discourse achieved a systematic critical review of its initial version outlined in "La morale sexuelle 'civilisée' et la maladie nerveuse des temps modemes". Through constructing the concepts of discontent and distress, the Freudian discourse thus made psychoanalysis social-proof. ln addition, it indicates that psychoanalysis was able to build a reading of modemity other than those made by Weber and Heidegger. Finally, this joumey also aims at thinking over the present crisis of psychoanalysis within the new conditions of discontent in modemity.
The article aims at showing the presence of two opposing theoretical discourses in Freud, in what concerns the relationship between the subject and modemity. It intends to demonstrate that in its second version, developed in Malaise dansia civilisation, the analytical discourse achieved a systematic critical review of its initial version outlined in "La morale sexuelle 'civilisée' et la maladie nerveuse des temps modemes". Through constructing the concepts of discontent and distress, the Freudian discourse thus made psychoanalysis social-proof. ln addition, it indicates that psychoanalysis was able to build a reading of modemity other than those made by Weber and Heidegger. Finally, this joumey also aims at thinking over the present crisis of psychoanalysis within the new conditions of discontent in modemity.
| Reference Key |
birman2005physiso
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Joel Birman |
| Journal | applied catalysis b: environmental |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0103-73312005000300010
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.