point of care testing of fecal calprotectin as a substitute for routine laboratory analysis
Clicks: 398
ID: 240421
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
398 views
43 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 12 articles by views in biochemia medica
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Objectives: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is widely used to monitor the activity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to tailor medical treatment to disease activity. Laboratory testing of fecal samples may have a turnaround time of 1–2 weeks, whereas FC home testing allows results within hours and thus enables a rapid response to clinical deterioration.
Design and methods: Fifty-five stool samples were analyzed by the IBDoc® Calprotectin Home Testing kit and the BÜHLMANN fCAL® turbo assay on a Roche Cobas 6000 c501. The correlation between the assays was assessed using Spearman's Rho correlation coefficient and the intermediate imprecision of both assays was calculated.
Results: We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.887 between FC measured on IBDoc® and the laboratory assay BÜHLMANN fCAL® turbo. The coefficients of variation (CVs) at three different FC levels were in the range 2.3–5.5% (BÜHLMANN fCAL® turbo) and in the range of 4.8–26.6% (IBDoc®).
Conclusions: This study suggests that IBDoc® is a suitable alternative for the assessment of disease activity in IBD patients.
| Reference Key |
hejl2018practicalpoint
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Julie Hejl;Klaus Theede;Brian Møllgren;Kirsten Vikkelsø Madsen;Ashraf Heidari;Anna á Steig;Mogens Fenger |
| Journal | biochemia medica |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.plabm.2017.11.002
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.