inverse modelling of ch4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from gosat and sciamachy
Clicks: 89
ID: 240340
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
26.4
/100
89 views
13 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #690 of 850 articles by views in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 850 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
At the beginning of 2009 new space-borne observations of dry-air column-averaged mole
fractions of atmospheric methane (XCH4) became available from the Thermal
And Near infrared Sensor for carbon Observations–Fourier Transform
Spectrometer (TANSO-FTS) instrument on board the Greenhouse Gases Observing
SATellite (GOSAT). Until April 2012 concurrent {methane (CH4) retrievals} were
provided by the SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric
CartograpHY (SCIAMACHY) instrument on board the ENVironmental SATellite (ENVISAT). The GOSAT and SCIAMACHY
XCH4 retrievals can be compared during the period of overlap. We estimate
monthly average CH4 emissions between January 2010 and December 2011,
using the TM5-4DVAR inverse modelling system. In addition to satellite data,
high-accuracy measurements from the Cooperative Air Sampling Network of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earth System Research
Laboratory (NOAA ESRL) are used, providing strong constraints on the remote
surface atmosphere. We discuss five inversion scenarios that make use of
different GOSAT and SCIAMACHY XCH4 retrieval products, including two sets
of GOSAT proxy retrievals processed independently by the Netherlands
Institute for Space Research (SRON)/Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT),
and the University of Leicester (UL), and the RemoTeC "Full-Physics" (FP)
XCH4 retrievals available from SRON/KIT. The GOSAT-based inversions show
significant reductions in the root mean square (rms) difference between
retrieved and modelled XCH4, and require much smaller bias corrections
compared to the inversion using SCIAMACHY retrievals, reflecting the higher
precision and relative accuracy of the GOSAT XCH4. Despite the large
differences between the GOSAT and SCIAMACHY retrievals, 2-year average
emission maps show overall good agreement among all satellite-based
inversions, with consistent flux adjustment patterns, particularly across
equatorial Africa and North America. Over North America, the satellite
inversions result in a significant redistribution of CH4 emissions from
North-East to South-Central United States. This result is consistent with recent
independent studies suggesting a systematic underestimation of CH4
emissions from North American fossil fuel sources in bottom-up inventories,
likely related to natural gas production facilities.
Furthermore, all four satellite inversions yield lower CH4 fluxes across
the Congo basin compared to the NOAA-only scenario, but higher emissions
across tropical East Africa. The GOSAT and SCIAMACHY inversions show
similar performance when validated against independent shipboard and aircraft
observations, and XCH4 retrievals available from the Total Carbon Column
Observing Network (TCCON).
| Reference Key |
alexe2015atmosphericinverse
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;M. Alexe;P. Bergamaschi;A. Segers;R. Detmers;A. Butz;O. Hasekamp;S. Guerlet;R. Parker;H. Boesch;C. Frankenberg;R. A. Scheepmaker;E. Dlugokencky;C. Sweeney;S. C. Wofsy;E. A. Kort |
| Journal | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.5194/acp-15-113-2015
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.