economic evaluation enhances public health decision making
Clicks: 327
ID: 240319
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
327 views
59 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #93 of 331 articles by views in Nanomaterials
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 331 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Contemporary public health professionals must address the health needs of a diverse population with constrained budgets and shrinking funds. Economic evaluation contributes to evidence-based decision making by helping the public health community identify, measure, and compare activities with the necessary impact, scalability, and sustainability to optimize population health. Asking how do investments in public health strategies influence or offset the need for downstream spending on medical care and /or social services? is important when making decisions about resource allocation and scaling of interventions.
| Reference Key |
rabarison2015frontierseconomic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Kristina M. Rabarison;Connie L. Bish;Mehran S. Massoudi;Wayne H. Giles |
| Journal | Nanomaterials |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fpubh.2015.00164
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.