transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

Clicks: 239
ID: 240026
2006
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #91 of 231 articles by views in planta medica

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 231 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

Background: Our purpose was to present our experiences with transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cancer and to compare our results with those published in the literature.

Patients and methods: Between June 2000 and March 2006 in 11 patients with age range 39 to 82 years (mean 56.3 years) in whom the renal cancer was found, we tried to do transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. For diagnosis of renal cancer abdominal ultrasound, CT scan, chest X-ray, blood and urine tests were done. During operative procedures we measured the operating time and blood loss. After procedure we registered analgesics needs of patients, hospital stay and patient’s return to normal activity. In all cases pathological examination of the specimen was done.

Results: Laparoscopic procedure was performed entirely in 8 patients. We have to reoperate 1 patient on second day after the first procedure because of the bleeding caused by blood coagulation disturbances. In 3 patients conversion into classical technique was necessary (major bleeding or technical difficulties). In 2 patients among 8 cases we finished the laparoscopic procedure using the hand-assisted technique. All patients had a renal cell carcinoma, 4 patients (50 %) in stage pT1, 2 (25 %) in stage pT2 and 2 (25 %) in stage pT3. The mean operating time was 209 minutes. Two patients were transfused with packed red cells. Analgesics were in all patients necessary on the day of operating procedure and the day after. The postoperative hospitalization range was 4 to 7 days. The patients began with normal physical activity 5 to 15 day after surgery.

Conclusions: Our initial results with transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy are comparable with those published in the literature. We believe that use of proper vascular staplers, other needful instruments and more experiences can significantly reduce the operating time.

Reference Key
zupani2006zdravnikitransperitoneal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Marko Zupančič;Nado Vodopija;Franc Kramer;Zoran Krstanoski;Ljubo Koršič
Journal planta medica
Year 2006
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.