machine learning approach for classifying multiple sclerosis courses by combining clinical data with lesion loads and magnetic resonance metabolic features
Clicks: 325
ID: 239747
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
325 views
39 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #47 of 403 articles by views in Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 403 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is classifying multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in the four clinical forms as defined by the McDonald criteria using machine learning algorithms trained on clinical data combined with lesion loads and magnetic resonance metabolic features.Materials and Methods: Eighty-seven MS patients [12 Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS), 30 Relapse Remitting (RR), 17 Primary Progressive (PP), and 28 Secondary Progressive (SP)] and 18 healthy controls were included in this study. Longitudinal data available for each MS patient included clinical (e.g., age, disease duration, Expanded Disability Status Scale), conventional magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging. We extract N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), Choline (Cho), and Creatine (Cre) concentrations, and we compute three features for each spectroscopic grid by averaging metabolite ratios (NAA/Cho, NAA/Cre, Cho/Cre) over good quality voxels. We built linear mixed-effects models to test for statistically significant differences between MS forms. We test nine binary classification tasks on clinical data, lesion loads, and metabolic features, using a leave-one-patient-out cross-validation method based on 100 random patient-based bootstrap selections. We compute F1-scores and BAR values after tuning Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Support Vector Machines with gaussian kernel (SVM-rbf), and Random Forests.Results: Statistically significant differences were found between the disease starting points of each MS form using four different response variables: Lesion Load, NAA/Cre, NAA/Cho, and Cho/Cre ratios. Training SVM-rbf on clinical and lesion loads yields F1-scores of 71–72% for CIS vs. RR and CIS vs. RR+SP, respectively. For RR vs. PP we obtained good classification results (maximum F1-score of 85%) after training LDA on clinical and metabolic features, while for RR vs. SP we obtained slightly higher classification results (maximum F1-score of 87%) after training LDA and SVM-rbf on clinical, lesion loads and metabolic features.Conclusions: Our results suggest that metabolic features are better at differentiating between relapsing-remitting and primary progressive forms, while lesion loads are better at differentiating between relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive forms. Therefore, combining clinical data with magnetic resonance lesion loads and metabolic features can improve the discrimination between relapsing-remitting and progressive forms.
| Reference Key |
ion-mrgineanu2017frontiersmachine
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Adrian Ion-Mărgineanu;Adrian Ion-Mărgineanu;Adrian Ion-Mărgineanu;Gabriel Kocevar;Claudio Stamile;Claudio Stamile;Claudio Stamile;Diana M. Sima;Diana M. Sima;Diana M. Sima;Françoise Durand-Dubief;Françoise Durand-Dubief;Sabine Van Huffel;Sabine Van Huffel;Dominique Sappey-Marinier;Dominique Sappey-Marinier |
| Journal | Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fnins.2017.00398
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.