changes in the quality of dressed chicken obtained from different sources during frozen storage
Clicks: 80
ID: 239506
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
1.5
/100
5 views
5 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
This present study examines the preservation quality of dressed chicken procured from
different sources of processing during storage at –18±1ºC. Breast portion of the dressed birds obtained
from three different sources, viz. market/road side slaughtered chicken (MSC), retail slaughtered
chicken (RSC), and scientifically slaughtered chicken (SSC), were cut into chunks, divided into 250 g
portions, packed in polyethylene bags, stored at –18±1ºC and evaluated at 30 days intervals for changes
in quality attributes. Frozen storage had no marked influence on pH change of the samples. SSC
samples had higher extract release volume (15.34±0.08 to 13.45±0.93 ml) than MSC (13.00±0.19 to
9.91±0.97 ml) and RSC samples (13.65±0.24 to 11.70±1.21ml). There was significant increase (P<0.05)
in thiobarbituric acid of all three sample types during storage but values were well below the threshold
level of spoilage. SSC samples showed lower tyrosine content throughout frozen storage compared to
MSC and RSC samples. A significant decline in microbial load, viz. total viable count, coliform count,
psychrophilic count and yeast and moulds count were noticed during frozen storage. Organoleptic
attributes, viz. appearance, flavour, texture and overall palatability were not affected due to frozen
storage except juiciness in MSC samples which decreased (P<0.05) from 6.53±0.13 to 5.96±0.11 on 90
days of storage. Although the scientifically slaughtered chicken had better quality, all the sample
types could be stored at –18±1ºC till 90 days without much deterioration in their quality.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (107 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
ht2014exploratorychanges
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Santosh Kumar HT;Uttam Kumar Pal;Prabhat Kumar Mandal;Chakradhar Das |
| Journal | physiologia plantarum |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.