limites do exercício do direito de recusa ao trabalho em condições de risco grave e iminente boundaries of the right to refuse to work under serious dangerous conditions
Clicks: 102
ID: 238272
1994
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
102 views
12 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #52 of 60 articles by views in journal of pharmacy and pharmacognosy research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
O Direito de Recusa ao Trabalho em condições de risco grave foi introduzido nas Constituições dos Estados de São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro em 1989, sem que grandes manifestações de seu exercício tenham chegado ao conhecimento público. Longe de ser uma expressão de sua inutilidade, mais parece ser o reflexo de relações de trabalho comprometidas pela desigualdade e que, em última instância, dificulta o trabalhador usufruir seus direitos duramente conquistados.
The right to refuse to work under serious dangerous conditions was introduced in the Constitutions of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro States in 1989. The impact of these measures did not reach public knowledge. It was not an expression of its uselessness. It seems to be the result of an unequal work relationship that, in the last instance, difficultates the worker usufruct of his rights gained in a hard process.
The right to refuse to work under serious dangerous conditions was introduced in the Constitutions of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro States in 1989. The impact of these measures did not reach public knowledge. It was not an expression of its uselessness. It seems to be the result of an unequal work relationship that, in the last instance, difficultates the worker usufruct of his rights gained in a hard process.
| Reference Key |
freitas1994gestolimites
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Nilton B. B. Freitas |
| Journal | journal of pharmacy and pharmacognosy research |
| Year | 1994 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0104-530X1994000100005
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.