five ways of representing the past, after the polemics surrounding juárez (1905-1906)

Clicks: 113
ID: 237478
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #160 of 199 articles by views in vision research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 199 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In the early twentieth century, Francisco Bulnes questioned the hegemonic representation of Benito Juárez. One of the answers was a literary contest to celebrate the first century of his birth. Rafael de Zayas Enríquez was rewarded for his biography, and Ricardo García Granados, Andrés Molina Enríquez and Porfirio Parra for their sociological studies of the Reform. This paper reconstructs the authors’ ennunciation horizon, analyzing specifically the ways of representing the past from the viewpoint  of history,  historical critique and sociology, as well as the uses of the past to diagnose national problems,  to reform the institutional framework and its political practices, and to create a homogeneous national identity.
Reference Key
argudn2008historiafive Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;María Luna Argudín
Journal vision research
Year 2008
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.