comparison and consistency of body fat estimation in children using three doubly indirect methods

Clicks: 277
ID: 236716
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #21 of 320 articles by views in european journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the european cancer prevention organisation (ecp)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 320 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of obesity has increased in children and adolescents, and this has become an obvious concern for public health. Objective: The aim of this study is to compare and verify the consistency of three indirect methods used for estimating body fat in children and adolescents. Materials and methods: Sample consisting of 90 children of both genders —33 (males) and 57 (females)—, and mean age of 9.45±0.72 years. To estimate body fat, three doubly indirect methods were applied: 1) bioelectrical impedance analysis method (BIA); 2) Skinfold methods (SM), and 3) body adiposity index method (BAI). Shapiro Wilk test was used for statistical analysis in order to verify sample distribution. The repeated measures ANOVA test with Bonferroni’s Post Hock was used for comparing the methods among the groups. The Bland-Altman plot and analysis was used to verify the consistency between the methods regarding the studied variables. Results: The results suggest that there was consistency and a positive correlation between the methods studied. Conclusion: The methods were reliable regarding the performed analysis; however, BIA underestimated body fat, when compared to other methods.
Reference Key
botelho-santos2017revistacomparison Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Giancarla Aparecida Botelho-Santos;Natália Fernanda Couto;Suelem Aparecida-de Almeida;Cintia Campolina Duarte-Rocha-da Silva;Jose Fernandes-Filho;Sandro Fernandes-da Silva
Journal european journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the european cancer prevention organisation (ecp)
Year 2017
DOI
10.15446/revfacmed.v65n4.60315
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.