information gap: demand supply environmental disclosure di indonesia

Clicks: 4
ID: 236523
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #98 of 99 articles by views in Biomolecules

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to invest igate informat ion gap of environmentaldisclosure in Indonesian and to examine relat ionship between company characterist ics andits environmental disclosures. Company characterist ics were ident if ied as size, prof itability,leverage, prof ile, and company’s operat ion territory. This study also examined proport ion ofindependent commissioner and the educat ional background of commissioner president ascont rol variable. Primary and secondary data were used in this research. Interview and questionnaire to 50 respondents as broader stakeholders were used as primary data. On average,there was high demand f rom respondents on environmental disclosure (score of 3.95 within5 Likert scale). Under purposive sampling, 100 annual reports of companies in BEI were selectedas secondary data. There was 44% of those disclosed environmental informat ion. Underweighted index, the level of disclosure was 4.84%. High demand f rom broader stakeholdersto disclose environmental informat ion does not supply properly by Indonesian companies.Thus, there was informat ion gap in environmetal disclosure. Result of logist ic regressionshowed that the determinants for Indonesian companies to disclosure environmentalinformat ion were Prof itabilit y; Leverage and Proport ion of Independent Commissioner. Inaddit ion, the signif icant predictors for the level of disclosure were Leverage; Proport ion ofIndependent Commissioner and the Educat ional Background of Commissioner President .
Reference Key
suhardjanto2017jurnalinformation Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Djoko Suhardjanto;Umi Choiriyah
Journal Biomolecules
Year 2017
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.