Pastoral Practices and Common Use of Pastureland: The Case of Karakul, North-Eastern Tajik Pamirs.
Clicks: 150
ID: 23637
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
63.5
/100
150 views
123 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #774 of 862 articles by views in International journal of environmental research and public health
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 862 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study describes pastoralism practiced in the Karakul village, Northeast of Tajikistan, and discusses its sustainability. Tajikistan introduced a market economy at independence in 1991, and pastoralism is now practiced on a family-unit basis. The families in Karakul graze livestock in their summer pastureland () and move their livestock to winter pastureland around the village (). They make groups for pasturage with several families in and also in . Each group pastures their livestock every day, using a system called . In addition to and , they also practice pastoralism on two additional kinds of pastureland: (spring pastureland) and (autumn pastureland). Still, now, the Karakul villagers use their pastureland as the commons: the Karakul village has not established private possession of pastureland even after a law enabled the division of common pastureland among individual families. Using the pastureland as the commons would be preferred by the local pastoralists. However, the free pasture access as the commons may result in a loss of sustainability as a trade-off. Regardless of privatization or the continued use of the commons, the possible development of the uneven use of the pastureland is inferred and should be avoided, and the introduction of a local management structure is urgently needed.
| Reference Key |
watanabe2018pastoralinternational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Watanabe, Teiji;Shirasaka, Shigeru; |
| Journal | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
E2725
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.