comparative studies on two tests for detection of avian influenza a virus and newcastle disease virus in co-infected guinea fowl (numida meleagris)

Clicks: 319
ID: 234253
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #3 of 8 articles by views in journal of indonesian applied economics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Thirty four oropharyngeal swabs were collected from guinea fowl infected with a low-pathogenicity avian influenza A virus Н6N2 (LPAIV H6N2) and vaccinated with a lentogenic NDV strain La Sota. All samples were examined in HI test after attempts for isolation of viruses in 9-day-old chick embryos (CЕ) and by means of AIV-NDV rapid Ag kit (RapiGEN, South Korea). The results demonstrated that the rapid test could be used for guinea fowl despite its lower sensitivity of 91.67 % as compared to the HI test after isolation in CE. The test specificity was 100 % indicating that it could distinguish both viruses in co-infections.
Reference Key
zarkov2018trakiacomparative Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Iv. Zarkov
Journal journal of indonesian applied economics
Year 2018
DOI
10.15547/tjs.2018.01.002
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.