research priorities in the field of posttraumatic pain and disability: results of a transdisciplinary consensus-generating workshop
Clicks: 536
ID: 234033
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
76.9
/100
536 views
419 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 128 articles by views in chemistryselect
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 128 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background. Chronic or persistent pain and disability following noncatastrophic “musculoskeletal” (MSK) trauma is a pervasive public health problem. Recent intervention trials have provided little evidence of benefit from several specific treatments for preventing chronic problems. Such findings may appear to argue against formal targeted intervention for MSK traumas. However, these negative findings may reflect a lack of understanding of the causal mechanisms underlying the transition from acute to chronic pain, rendering informed and objective treatment decisions difficult. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis (IMHA) has recently identified better understanding of causal mechanisms as one of three priority foci of their most recent strategic plan. Objectives. A 2-day invitation-only active participation workshop was held in March 2015 that included 30 academics, clinicians, and consumers with the purpose of identifying consensus research priorities in the field of trauma-related MSK pain and disability, prediction, and prevention. Methods. Conversations were recorded, explored thematically, and member-checked for accuracy. Results. From the discussions, 13 themes were generated that ranged from a focus on identifying causal mechanisms and models to challenges with funding and patient engagement. Discussion. Novel priorities included the inclusion of consumer groups in research from the early conceptualization and design stages and interdisciplinary longitudinal studies that include evaluation of integrated phenotypes and mechanisms.
| Reference Key |
walton2016painresearch
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;David M. Walton;James M. Elliott;Joshua Lee;Eldon Loh;Joy C. MacDermid;Siobhan Schabrun;Walter L. Siqueira;Brian D. Corneil;Bill Aal;Trevor Birmingham;Amy Brown;Lynn K. Cooper;James P. Dickey;S. Jeffrey Dixon;Douglas D. Fraser;Joseph S. Gati;Gregory B. Gloor;Gordon Good;David Holdsworth;Samuel A. McLean;Wanda Millard;Jordan Miller;Jackie Sadi;David A. Seminowicz;J. Kevin Shoemaker;Gunter P. Siegmund;Theodore Vertseegh;Timothy H. Wideman |
| Journal | chemistryselect |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1155/2016/1859434
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.