features of psychological space sovereignty maintained by people with different attitude to solitude
Clicks: 116
ID: 233600
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
116 views
15 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #109 of 210 articles by views in Journal of environmental radioactivity
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 210 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Living in a big city is imbued with anthropogenic and stress-producing factors. It generates an increased load to inward personality mechanisms with the help of which a citizen eases mental tension emerging as a response to stressors impact. The possibility for a person to be alone is one of the resources for stress coping. In addition, having one’s own territory is important for the development of mature and mentally sound personality. Under communication and information overload integral to living in a megapolis a person can preserve his uniqueness and psychological wellbeing on the condition of retaining personal boundaries. All this allows us to indicate that issues relating to personal space sovereignty and modern townsfolk’s’ attitude to solitude are highly relevant. Besides, it should be noted that the ability to find potential in spending time in solitude differs from person to person and is purely individual. The study was conducted to explore characteristics of personal boundaries sovereignty and solitude ability in modern megapolis inhabitants. The techniques used in the study include differential solitude scale (E.N. Osin, D.A. Leont’ev), projective drawing of personal space in the family, a questionnaire. The results obtained can be used for designing psychocorrection sessions, trainings. In the course of the study statistically significant distinctions in males and females groups and in the respondents with different solitude ability were revealed.
Purpose. The study is aimed at identifying features of psychological space maintained by people with different attitude to solitude.
Methodology. The methods used in the study include subject-being and subject-environment approaches to personality, eco-psychological approach and psychology of sovereignty principles.
Results. In the course of the study by the example of megapolis residents statistically significant distinctions in groups with different attitude to solitude and solitude ability were found. The higher the solitude ability, the lower the rate of deprivation and space over-sovereignty, and the respondents with high ability to solitude lack over-sovereignty with regard to parameters of physical body, personal belongings, habits and values.
Practical implications. The results can be useful for developing psychocorrection sessions and trainings. The data can be helpful for specialists of Family Psychological Support centers and for instructors of “Ecological Psychology”, “Family Relations Psychology” disciplines. The study carried out is likely to be highly educational since many respondents participating in the survey admitted that they had never considered personal boundaries violation to be the reason for marital conflicts. They also lacked information concerning psychological space, how to regulate personal space boundaries and how to respond to other family members behavior in an adequate manner.
| Reference Key |
garipova2017sovremennyefeatures
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Nadezhda Alekseevna Garipova;Ludmila Petrovna Karavaeva |
| Journal | Journal of environmental radioactivity |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.12731/2218-7405-2017-5-94-109
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.