justice for aristotle, kant e sandel: a comparative study
Clicks: 227
ID: 233503
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
227 views
44 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #12 of 14 articles by views in social science research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This work intends to show the conception of justice for great masters in this subject. They are Aristotle, Kant e Sandel. The reason of the choice of these specialists is that each one lived in different ages, so, their point of view serve as a paradigm to this study. In Aristotle it will be explored the conception of justice in Ethic to Nicomachean, where it searches to characterize an understanding of the meaning of justice as a virtue strictly human by interpretative analyses.; In Kant, the doctrine of law in Metaphysics of Morals; and, finally, Michael J. Sandel, in the work Justice - what is the right thing to do.
| Reference Key |
moraes2015revistajustice
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Líria Kédina Cuimar de Sousa Moraes |
| Journal | social science research |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9644/2015.v1i1.733
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.