anonymity, ethics and credibility in the blogosphere and on twitter: gastronomic criticism in “alhos, passas & maçãs” and in @carapuceiro
Clicks: 205
ID: 233222
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
195 views
19 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
This article intends to understand the anonymous restaurant critic currently made on the Internet, based on the cases of the Alhos, passas & maçãs blog and the @carapuceiro Twitter. Before considered as personal diaries or means of communication among friends, today blogs and social networks have no limits – and, when used to criticize restaurants negatively, its impact reaches unpremeditated boundaries, including reactions of chefs and journalists themselves. At the same time that these tools extend the possibilities of subjective comments written by ordinary people, without a degree in journalism, the press loses credibility by choosing to criticize in a courteous way, submitting itself to the invitations sent by press offices and to the “cordial journalism”.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (115 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
amaral2012ciberlegendaanonymity,
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Renata Maria do Amaral |
| Journal | brazilian journal of microbiology |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.