el método topsis relativo vs. absoluto
Clicks: 243
ID: 233160
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
243 views
35 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #13 of 46 articles by views in acque sotterranee
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Multicriteria decision making methods are essential tools to make decisions in the corporate world. We focus here in the TOPSIS method to analyze the impact that, the way the decision matrix is constructed affects the final results. Two different ways are analized: firstly, the original matrix is considered, and secondly, a variant including two novel alternatives is used. These alternatives are constructed taking into account the range of the corresponding criteria. We made comparisons using a location problem derived from the renewable energy field.
| Reference Key |
blanca2013rect@el
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Ceballos, Blanca;Lamata, M. Teresa;Pelta, David;Sánchez, J. Miguel |
| Journal | acque sotterranee |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.