small ruminants production practices in upland ranges of
Clicks: 205
ID: 233138
2002
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
205 views
20 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #37 of 56 articles by views in ecti damt-ncon 2019 - 4th international conference on digital arts, media and technology and 2nd ecti northern section conference on electrical, electronics, computer and telecommunications engineering
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A survey was conducted during the year 1999-2000 involving 120 farmers on a pre-tested questionnaire out of which 32. 70 and 18 farmers were from nomads. transhumant and sedentary classes respectively. It revealed that mostly selection was done in the male animals based on breeding efficiency, pedigree and individual performance of the animal. Males were selected within flock or taken from other flocks without any costs for some period. Majority of the farmers (57%) had adopted nutritional supplementation practices. For this purpose, they purchased fodder and concentrates rations. Nomads for feeding their animals were depending on grazing only, while transhumant and sedentary people were also growing fodder on agricultural land. Out of 120 respondents, 24.17 percent reported that they pay for grazing in the form of animals and their products. In nomads, transhumantand sedentary average losses of the mean flock size were 37.40, 22.58 and 25.37 percent respectively. Overall average animal losses were 39.48 with the standard deviation of 32.82 animals, which was 26.68 percent of mean flock size.
| Reference Key |
gondal2002pakistansmall
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Asad Ullah Hyder, Abdul Salam Lodhi*, Muhammad Yaqoob and K.Z. Gondal |
| Journal | ecti damt-ncon 2019 - 4th international conference on digital arts, media and technology and 2nd ecti northern section conference on electrical, electronics, computer and telecommunications engineering |
| Year | 2002 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.