sobre el término crítico ἀναβολή en la comedia de aristófanes
Clicks: 6
ID: 232817
2001
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
1.5
/100
6 views
5 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #125 of 144 articles by views in south african journal of botany
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 144 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The term ἀναβολή was used by literary criticism of comedy against the late fifth-century dithyramb. It received diverse interpretations yet in ancient as well as in modern times. My contribution is intended to clarify: 1) the possible origins of some of the confusions in interpretation applied to the term in antiquity and transmitted into the present; 2) its possible meaning, on the basis of testimonies which – like the one of the pseudo-aristotelic Problemata – establish a relation between the dithyramb and other poetic genders of the late fifth-century b.C., the citharodic νόμοι and the tragic monody.
| Reference Key |
quijada2001emeritasobre
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Milagros Quijada |
| Journal | south african journal of botany |
| Year | 2001 |
| DOI |
10.3989/emerita.2001.v69.i2.130
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.