clinical application comparison of three different methods for detecting children near stereoacuity

Clicks: 177
ID: 232732
2013
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #117 of 133 articles by views in journal of fungi

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 133 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
AIM: To compare the differences of Titmus stereopsis test, random dot by Yan Shaoming and another random-dot which by Jin Guichang on stereopsis inspection in children.

METHODS: Near binocular stereoacuity of 81 cases(5-7 years)was examined with three kinds of methods under the same test conditions. The results were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS: The results of Yan stereo and Titmus stereopsis had no significant difference(χ2=0.2282, P=0.6329). There were significant differences on both normal stereopsis and abnormal stereopsis results by Jin stereo and the other two methods(χ2=58.1692, P< 0.01).

CONCLUSION: The results of Yan's random dot stereogram and Titmus stereopsis test are similar, while large difference is in the Jin stereopsis inspection. In clinical application, Different methods should be used to evaluate stereoscopic vision.

Reference Key
qi2013guojiclinical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Hao-Hui Qi;De-Jian Hong;Fei Zhu
Journal journal of fungi
Year 2013
DOI
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2013.10.68
URL
http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2013/10/201310068.pdf
Keywords
examination

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.