clinical application comparison of three different methods for detecting children near stereoacuity

Clicks: 118
ID: 232732
2013
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
AIM: To compare the differences of Titmus stereopsis test, random dot by Yan Shaoming and another random-dot which by Jin Guichang on stereopsis inspection in children.

METHODS: Near binocular stereoacuity of 81 cases(5-7 years)was examined with three kinds of methods under the same test conditions. The results were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS: The results of Yan stereo and Titmus stereopsis had no significant difference(χ2=0.2282, P=0.6329). There were significant differences on both normal stereopsis and abnormal stereopsis results by Jin stereo and the other two methods(χ2=58.1692, P< 0.01).

CONCLUSION: The results of Yan's random dot stereogram and Titmus stereopsis test are similar, while large difference is in the Jin stereopsis inspection. In clinical application, Different methods should be used to evaluate stereoscopic vision.

Reference Key
qi2013guojiclinical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Hao-Hui Qi;De-Jian Hong;Fei Zhu
Journal journal of fungi
Year 2013
DOI
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2013.10.68
URL
http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2013/10/201310068.pdf
Keywords
examination

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.