apie lietuvių senųjų raštų atoninę įvardžio formą te ‘tave’

Clicks: 4
ID: 231583
2011
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #195 of 195 articles by views in current pharmaceutical biotechnology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 195 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract

ABOUT THE ATONIC FORM OF 2 SG. ACC. te IN THE OLD LITHUANIAN TEXTS

Summary

In the old Lithuanian texts the atonic form gen., dat., acc. m(i), t(i) (Zinkevičius 1981, 49) is also used alongside the orthotonic genitive, dative and accusative forms of the first and the second person. The usual forms are mi, ti or the shortened ones -m or -t, except some forms te: used in the meaning of the second person accusative in the hymnal written by Saliamonas Mozerka Slavočinskis (SG) IOzapay pamażu / Meldźiute pamażu SG I 60,4–5, Sunau te girdźiu raudanti / Aſż ſaweſp tawe biłanti SG I 95,16–17 and Aß teyſingay ir łáymingay / Gȧrbinċiau te tułomis SG II 98,26–27. It is interesting that the clitic -te is used instead of the usual -ti in the old writings. The above-mentioned forms cannot be analysed apart from the reflexive particle, the origin of which is pronominal as well. Hermann is known to have paid attention to this phenomenon (1926, 83). It is thought that the reflexive particle se reflects the Baltic *s (Zinkevičius 1966, 331f.; Mažiulis 1959, 13; Rosinas 1995, 36). With reference to the form the Balts can be thought to have had other forms of accusative of pronominal clitics, such as *m, *t (Rosinas 1995, 36). Consequently, the forms with -te attested in the hymnal of Slavočinskis and in „Knyga nobažnystės“ show that the Baltic *t enclitic form te ‘tave’ is directly attested.

Reference Key
razanovait2011baltisticaapie Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Auksė Razanovaitė
Journal current pharmaceutical biotechnology
Year 2011
DOI
10.15388/baltistica.45.2.1512
URL
http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/1512
Keywords
linguistics

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.