türkiye bal arısı (apis mellifera l.) alttürlerinde genetik çeşitlilik kaybı
Clicks: 323
ID: 231568
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
323 views
38 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #10 of 10 articles by views in The Journal of medical humanities
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In recent years it is thought that there has been a homogenization in honeybee biodiversity of Turkey due to the widespread migratory beekeeping and the use of commercial queenbee. Therefore, in the present study it was investigated whether the honey bee biodiversity of Turkey is conserved or not. For
this aim worker honey bee samples were taken from 32 different locations of Turkey and the right front wing were studied considering 19 landmarks by using geometric morphometric method. According to research results, although there are local areas within local honeybee races are protected, biodiversity of
Turkey which was reported in previous studies (Apis mellifera caucasica in the north, Apis mellifera meda in the south, Apis mellifera syriaca in the southwest, Apis mellifera carnica in Thrace and A. manatoliaca in rest of Anatolia) has not been protected today. Discriminant function analysis and UPGMA dendograms showed that each of Isparta, Ardahan, Gaziantep,Kahramanmaraş and Zonguldak populations were clustered separately and distiguished from other populations. On the other side,
Kırklareli and Igdır formed a group; Izmir, Van and Hatay formed other group, Hakkari, Antalya, Mugla, Bilecik, Balıkesir and Canakkale formed other chorent group. Generated groupings in this study were not incompatible with previous literature reports. Overlapping of samples representing subspecies from different regions showed that honeybee biodiversity in Turkey was significantly affected by the usage activities of commercial queenbee.
| Reference Key |
kambur2018anadolutrkiye
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Merve Kambur; Meral Kekeçoğlu |
| Journal | The Journal of medical humanities |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.7161/omuanajas.337798
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.