authoritarian regime in belarus: history of formation

Clicks: 112
ID: 231566
2014
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #85 of 153 articles by views in ifmbe proceedings

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 153 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
In the article the main stages of formation contemporary political regime of Belarus and its legitimacy base are highlighted. The constitutional powers of central government are investigated. The place of the presidency in the system of government in the light on practical implementation of the principle of separation of powers is defined. It is found the basic principles of Lukashenko’s model of political development of Belarus. Although from a formal point of view Belarus is a presidential-parliamentary republic, according to the analysis results the system of power has been defined as the super-presidential republic. As a result substantiates the thesis that today in Belarus there is unlimited super-presidential system, which is the basis for the establishment of the regime of one-man rule of President Alexander Lukashenko. Hypertrophied nature of presidential power correlated with the weakening and degradation of the institutions of government which should prevent the concentration of power in the presidency. It is primarily about the Parliament and the Constitutional Court. The weakness of these institutions and the dominance of the executive branch headed by the President due to both formal and informal factors: objective uncertainty of formal rules and procedures or deliberate lack of elaborated ones in the relationship between the various institutions of the government gives rise to the so-called gray areas that create opportunities for the president to extralegal action and thus strengthening his actual power.
Reference Key
shipunov2014granauthoritarian Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;G. V. Shipunov
Journal ifmbe proceedings
Year 2014
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://grani.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/643
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.