survey on the clinical trial results achieved in brazil comparing praziquantel and oxamniquine in the treatment of mansoni schistosomiasis
Clicks: 147
ID: 230795
1985
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
147 views
35 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #132 of 173 articles by views in 2017 12th international conference for internet technology and secured transactions, icitst 2017
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 173 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A random, double-blind, parallel group clinical trial program was carried out to compare praziquantel, a recently developed anti-helmintic drug, and oxamniquine, an already established agent for treating mansoni schistosomiasis. Both drugs were administered orally as a single dose, on the average, praziquantel 55 mg/kg and oxamniquine 16 mg/kg BWT. The diagnosis and the parasitological follow-up lasting for a minimum of six months, were based on stool examinations according to Kato/Katz technique. A patient was considered cured if all results were negative and if he had performed at least three post-treatment controls, each one comprising three stool examinations. The finding of a single S. mansoni egg in any stool examination indicated, a therapeutical failure. A total of 267, cases were treated with praziquantel and 272 with oxamniquine. The two groups were homogeneous in regard to patients, age, clinical form of the disease, risk of reinfection and worm burden, relevant factors in the therapeutical response. The incidence and severity of untoward, effects were similar in both groups but abdominal distress and diarrhoea were more frequently reported under praziquantel and dizzines under oxamniquine (p < 0.05). In the former group a marked urticariform reaction was observed whereas in the latter one patient presented convulsion. The laboratory work-up. failed to disclose any significant alteration although the AST, ALT and y-GT mean values revealed a tendence to increase on the 7th day after oxamniquine intake. The overall parasitological cure rates were 75.5% (139/ 184) with praziquantel and 69.8% (134/192) with oxamniquine (p > 0.05). Amongst the noncured aptients a reduction of 88.6% and 74.6% in the mean number of eggs/g of feces Was seen following the treatment with praziquantel and oxamniquine, respectively (p < 0.05). In conclusion, in spite of their different chemical, pharmacological and toxicological profiles as well as mechanisms-of-action, inclusively praziquantel already had proved to be 100% active against S. mansoni strains resistant to oxamniquine, both drugs showed comparable tolerance and therapeutical efficacy.
| Reference Key |
rezende1985revistasurvey
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Getúlio Leonel de Rezende |
| Journal | 2017 12th international conference for internet technology and secured transactions, icitst 2017 |
| Year | 1985 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0036-46651985000600006
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.