research concearning the productive effect of high proportions of barley in forage diets, as well as the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae yea-sacc1026strain
Clicks: 259
ID: 230770
2007
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
259 views
60 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #49 of 249 articles by views in Enzyme and microbial technology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 249 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In a previous study it has been shown, that adding Yea-Sacc1026 in diets with high percentage of voluminous forage, improves the digestibility of organic substance from 78.93% to 92.05% after 48 hours of fermentation [1]. The highest coefficient of digestion for the organic substance with or without yeast has been obtained with a barley proportion of 40%: 86.87% after 48 hours of fermentation without yeast and 89.95% with yeast. The rate of digestion was rapidly influenced by adding Yea- Sacc1026 in forage diets and has an impact on the fodder consume and is therefore a method of improving the performance of the animals. This study has observed the productive parameters (body weight, daily medium growth), as well as the effect of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Yea-Sacc1026 strain, on them. In the first 12 days of the experiment, the daily medium growth was 250 g/day for the control lot and 263 g/day at the experimental lot. During the entire period of the experiment, the daily medium growth was significantly higher (p<0.02) at the experimental lot EL, 196 g/ day, in comparison with the control lot WL, 170 g/day. The variance is 7.86% at the EL lot and 16.38% at the WL lot.
| Reference Key |
creescu2007scientificresearch
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;IULIANA CREŢESCU;S. VOIA;D. DRÎNCEANU;RODICA CHEREJI |
| Journal | Enzyme and microbial technology |
| Year | 2007 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.