Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

Clicks: 292
ID: 23015
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To study the effectiveness and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) commonly used in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).People with JME were identified from a large database of individuals with epilepsy, which includes detailed retrospective information on AED use. We assessed secular changes in AED use and calculated rates of response (12-month seizure freedom) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for the five most common AEDs. Retention was modeled with a Cox proportional hazards model. We compared valproate use between males and females.We included 305 people with 688 AED trials of valproate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, carbamazepine, and topiramate. Valproate and carbamazepine were most often prescribed as the first AED. The response rate to valproate was highest among the five AEDs (42.7%), and significantly higher than response rates for lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and topiramate; the difference to the response rate to levetiracetam (37.1%) was not significant. The rates of ADRs were highest for topiramate (45.5%) and valproate (37.5%). Commonest ADRs included weight change, lethargy, and tremor. In the Cox proportional hazards model, later start year (1.10 [1.08-1.13],  < 0.001) and female sex (1.41 [1.07-1.85],  = 0.02) were associated with shorter trial duration. Valproate was associated with the longest treatment duration; trials with carbamazepine and topiramate were significantly shorter (HR [CI]: 3.29 [2.15-5.02],  < 0.001 and 1.93 [1.31-2.86],  < 0.001). The relative frequency of valproate trials shows a decreasing trend since 2003 while there is an increasing trend for levetiracetam. Fewer females than males received valproate (76.2% vs 92.6%,  = 0.001).In people with JME, valproate is an effective AED; levetiracetam emerged as an alternative. Valproate is now contraindicated in women of childbearing potential without special precautions. With appropriate selection and safeguards in place, valproate should remain available as a therapy, including as an alternative for women of childbearing potential whose seizures are resistant to other treatments.
Reference Key
silvennoinen2019comparativeepilepsia Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Silvennoinen, Katri;de Lange, Nikola;Zagaglia, Sara;Balestrini, Simona;Androsova, Ganna;Wassenaar, Merel;Auce, Pauls;Avbersek, Andreja;Becker, Felicitas;Berghuis, Bianca;Campbell, Ellen;Coppola, Antonietta;Francis, Ben;Wolking, Stefan;Cavalleri, Gianpiero L;Craig, John;Delanty, Norman;Johnson, Michael R;Koeleman, Bobby P C;Kunz, Wolfram S;Lerche, Holger;Marson, Anthony G;O'Brien, Terence J;Sander, Josemir W;Sills, Graeme J;Striano, Pasquale;Zara, Federico;van der Palen, Job;Krause, Roland;Depondt, Chantal;Sisodiya, Sanjay M;, ;
Journal epilepsia open
Year 2019
DOI
10.1002/epi4.12349
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.