por una reparaciÓn integral del daÑo extracontractual limitada a los hechos dolosos o gravemente negligentes* for a full compensation for harm in tort limited to intentional and grossly negligent acts
Clicks: 97
ID: 229697
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
1.8
/100
6 views
6 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Este artículo postula que, en la responsabilidad extracontractual, la reparación integral de los daños directos (tanto previstos/previsibles como imprevistos/imprevisibles) debería quedar confinada a los hechos dolosos o gravemente negligentes, de modo similar a lo que acontece en la responsabilidad contractual. En contraste, la responsabilidad a que da lugar el cuasidelito cometido con culpa leve o levísima debiera comprender únicamente los daños directos previstos o previsibles, en forma análoga a lo que ocurre con infracciones contractuales meramente negligentes. Por ende, aunque cualquier falta de cuidado puede engendrar responsabilidad extracontractual, sólo quienes cometen un hecho ilícito intencional o sumamente descuidado deben resarcir la totalidad de los daños que emanan directamente de ese comportamiento, por extraordinarias o imprevisibles que sean dichas consecuencias.
This article argues that full compensation for direct damages in tort liability (both foreseen/foreseeable and unforeseen/unforeseeable) ought to be confined to intentional or grossly negligent acts, similarly to contractual liability. Conversely, liability arising from acts done with ordinary or slightest fault should solely encompass direct foreseen or foreseeable damages, analogously to careless breaches of contract. Thus, although any lack of due care can trigger tort liability, only those who commit intentional or extremely careless acts should pay for all the damages directly derived from such conduct, however extraordinary or unforeseeable said consequences might be.
This article argues that full compensation for direct damages in tort liability (both foreseen/foreseeable and unforeseen/unforeseeable) ought to be confined to intentional or grossly negligent acts, similarly to contractual liability. Conversely, liability arising from acts done with ordinary or slightest fault should solely encompass direct foreseen or foreseeable damages, analogously to careless breaches of contract. Thus, although any lack of due care can trigger tort liability, only those who commit intentional or extremely careless acts should pay for all the damages directly derived from such conduct, however extraordinary or unforeseeable said consequences might be.
| Reference Key |
ro2012iuspor
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Cristian Banfi del Río |
| Journal | set-valued and variational analysis |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.