used models and criteria for asset yields explanation
Clicks: 91
ID: 229641
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
25.8
/100
91 views
13 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #33 of 35 articles by views in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
There were compared two known models (CAPM and TPA resuting the model describing better, in case of Romania , cashings and variation of cashings for ensured guarantees.There were taken into account monthly cashings (1.01.2005-31.12.2010 period) of 60 companies listed at Bucharest Stock Exchange (BVB).
| Reference Key |
pieleanu2012revistaused
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Florin Dan PIELEANU |
| Journal | Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.