students\' approaches to learning superficial, strategic and deep
Clicks: 222
ID: 229464
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
222 views
26 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #7 of 7 articles by views in zhong nan da xue xue bao yi xue ban = journal of central south university medical sciences
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Aims: Approaches to learning are series of mental activities of learners during study which used for more effective receiving, organizing and recalling information. The purpose of this study was to study superficial, strategic and deep approaches to learning among students.
Instrument & Methods: In this descriptive survey which is done in 2012-13 academic year, 380 students of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (152 males and 228 females) were selected using a stratified sampling method based on gender. The instrument of this research was the Tait et al revised ASSIST questionnaire. SPSS 20 was used to analyze data by single variant T, independent T, Analysis of Variance, and Bonferroni Post Hoc tests.
Findings: 179 of students (47.1%) were using strategic approach, 133 students (35.0%) were using superficial approach and only 68 (17.9%) were using deep approach. There was a significant difference in the deep (p<0.001) and strategic (p<0.005) approaches between average scores of male and female students. Among the age groups, there was also a significant difference in the superficial superficial (p<0.01) and deep approach (p<0.005).
Conclusion: More than 80% of students use superficial and strategic approaches that are memory-based and result-oriented. In contrast, students are less oriented to use deep approach to learning.
| Reference Key |
v2015educationstudents\'
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Mehdinezhad V;Esmaeeli R |
| Journal | zhong nan da xue xue bao yi xue ban = journal of central south university medical sciences |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.