a perspective on materials databases
Clicks: 203
ID: 228800
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
203 views
37 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #207 of 292 articles by views in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 292 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Several challenges are involved in developing and maintaining materials property databases, including improvements in measurement procedures, the changing nature of materials, access to proprietary data on new materials, and the need for quality evaluation. In this paper we discuss each of these issues and their impact on the availability of high quality material property data, using ceramics as an example material.
| Reference Key |
freiman2012dataa
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Stephen Freiman;John Rumble |
| Journal | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
10.2481/dsj.AMDS2012_Freiman-002
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.