a filosofia e seu ensino como phármakon the teaching of philosophy as pharmakon

Clicks: 26
ID: 228795
2012
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #42 of 43 articles by views in chemistry of natural compounds

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
O presente texto busca problematizar o valor e o sentido de ensinar filosofia a partir de sua caracterização como phármakon a partir das figuras de Sócrates e Platão. Numa primeira parte, destaca a forma em que Sócrates apresenta a Filosofia, as suas condições e a ele próprio como filósofo no Fedro e em passagens de outros diálogos de Platão; num segundo momento, detalha a condenação de Platão à escrita no Fedro, levando em consideração aportes críticos de J. Derrida e G. Deleuze para estabelecer o que está em jogo nessa condenação; numa terceira seção, apresenta os efeitos pedagógicos e políticos dessa condenação e como ela coloca Platão numa posição surpreendentemente oposta em relação ao seu próprio mestre, Sócrates. Finalmente, são extraídas algumas conclusões dessa disputa e do valor que ela pode ter para o que hoje pensamos sobre o ensino de Filosofia no Brasil.
This article goes back to Socrates and Plato to reach for elements that help us to think about the meaning and sense of teaching Philosophy through the concept of pharmakon. In the first section, we present a characterization that Socrates makes on Philosophy, its conditions and on himself as a philosopher in Phaedrus and in some other dialogues by Plato; the second section offers details of Plato's condemnation for writing in Phaedrus, taking into consideration the criticism of J. Derrida and G. Deleuze to establish what is at stake in that censure; in the third section, the pedagogical and political effects of such condemnation are presented, and also how it places Plato in a surprising opposite position in relation to his own teacher, Socrates. Finally, there are some conclusions of that combat and of its value for those who are now thinking the teaching of Philosophy in Brazil in the present moment.
Reference Key
kohan2012educara Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Walter Omar Kohan
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal chemistry of natural compounds
Year 2012
DOI
10.1590/S0104-40602012000400004
URL
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-40602012000400004
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.