liquidity risk on banking industry: comparative study between islamic bank and conventional bank in indonesia

Clicks: 221
ID: 227573
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #19 of 30 articles by views in economic annals-xxi

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

Conventional and Islamic banks approximately are similar in risk summary. Therefore it needs further observations to control their liquidity risk. This study investigates the influence of CAR, profitability rasios, NIM, liquidity gaps, and RLA belongs to liquidity risk on banking industry. The statistical analysis concluded that there are negative and significant influence of CAR and ROE to liquidity risk on conventional banks, while ROA and RLA have positive and significant effect. In Islamic banks, a positive and significant impact of NIM and ROE to dependent variable, whereas liquidity gaps and RLA have significat effect.

DOI: 10.15408/aiq.v5i2.2118

Reference Key
muharam2015al-iqtishad:liquidity Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Harjum Muharam;Hasna Penta Kurnia
Journal economic annals-xxi
Year 2015
DOI
10.15408/aiq.v5i2.2118
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.