marginalia to the (international) jurisdiction in the matters of parental responsibility

Clicks: 256
ID: 227519
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #6 of 7 articles by views in Žurnal infektologii

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The criteria of the Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (hereinafter: Regulation) concerning the jurisdiction in the matters of parental responsibility differ from the criteria adopted in domestic law. First, this applies to situations in which the ancillary matters relating to parental responsibility are connected with the divorce proceedings. The specificities of these proceedings of domestic law are also peaceful resolution mechanisms. The peaceful resolution mechanisms should precede the seising of a court, which opens the question of the definition of “seising of a court” in the system of the jurisdiction established by the Regulation. The aim of this paper is to analyse the rules of the (international) jurisdiction for the ancillary proceedings on parental responsibility. The practical issues that arise from the implementation of the Regulation are also discussed. At the time of writing, the Proposal for a recast of the Regulation was published, in which certain interventions in the system of jurisdiction in the matters of parental responsibility are made. The procedural consequences of the revised rules on jurisdiction in the matters of parental responsibility are also analysed in this paper.
Reference Key
kramar2017pravnimarginalia Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Slađana Aras Kramar
Journal Žurnal infektologii
Year 2017
DOI
10.25234/pv/4913
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.