interpersonal relations in the thought of marcel and levinas: from intersubjectivity to otherness

Clicks: 198
ID: 225365
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #41 of 128 articles by views in bmc biotechnology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 128 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This article is a reflection on a key theme in some of today’s most important philosophical currents: interpersonal relations. In the 20th century many thinkers opted for a different treatment of the person, and especially his or her openness to others. The approach taken in this article will throw light on the confluence of diverse postures and, at the same time, will offer a good starting point for clarifying fundamental differences that separate certain philosophers who, in principle, appear to be very close. Specifically, the objective of this article is to analyze the philosophies of Marcel and Lévinas, showing that, despite what they have in common, their anthropologies are very different. While Marcel holds that anthropology is linked to ontology, although not dependent upon it, Lévinas proposes that ethics should become first philosophy. As a result, for Marcel human relations are intersubjective, while for Lévinas the only way to treat of the human being is via otherness.
Reference Key
urabayen2016pensamiento.interpersonal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Julia Urabayen
Journal bmc biotechnology
Year 2016
DOI
10.14422/pen.v72.i270.y2016.004
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.