¿qué fue del recurso de amparo ante el tribunal constitucional? // what has happen with amparo appeal before the constitutional court?

Clicks: 169
ID: 225257
2018
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #35 of 81 articles by views in international journal of refugee law

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Resumen: El trabajo estudia la evolución y situación actual del recurso de amparo ante el Tribunal Constitucional. Parte de la base de que la cuestión consiste en analizar la aplicación y resultados de la reforma de la Ley Orgánica del Tribunal Constitucional que se realizó en 2007. La reforma se aplicó con algún titubeo inicialmente por parte del Tribunal Constitucional pero finalmente se ha llevado hasta las últimas consecuencias. Esto ha producido un resultado positivo, pues el Tribunal Constitucional está prácticamente al día, muy lejos de la situación de inviabilidad que se dibujaba cuando se concibió la reforma, es decir, en torno al año 2006. Pero la reforma sigue siendo criticada por haber disminuido las garantías del justiciable. Sin embargo, los datos que ofrece en sus Memorias el Tribunal Constitucional permiten constatar que la inmensa mayoría de los recursos se inadmiten por defectuoso planteamiento. El trabajo propone como mejoras el establecimiento de salas de amparo en los Tribunales Superiores de Justicia y en el Tribunal Supremo y el rigor en la exigencia de la invocación del derecho fundamental tan pronto como es vulnerado. Además, considera aconsejable que los abogados no se limiten a la invocación genérica del derecho fundamental, sino que expongan ante la jurisdicción ordinaria el embrión del posible recurso de amparo. Abstract: The article studies the evolution and the current situation of the amparo appeal before the Constitutional Court. The question is to analyze the application and results of the reform of the Constitutional Court Organization Act that was held in 2007. The reform was applied with some hesitation initially by the Constitutional Court but finally has been carried to the last consequences. This has produced a positive result, because the Constitutional Court is practically up to date, very far from the situation of unfeasibility that was drawn when the reform was conceived, that is to say, around the year 2006. But the reform continues being criticized for having diminished the guarantees of the defendant. However, the data that the Constitutional Court offers in its reports allow us to confirm that the vast majority of the appeals are inadmissible due to a defective approach. The work proposes as improvements the establishment of amparo chambers in the Superior Courts of Justice and in the Supreme Court and the rigor in demanding the invocation of the fundamental right as soon as it is violated. In addition, it considers advisable that the lawyers expose before the ordinary jurisdiction the embryo of the possible resource of amparo.   Summary: 1. Introduction; 2. First period in the interpretation of the reform of 2007: from the promulgation of the law to the ECHR Judgment "Arribas Antón"; 3. Second period in the application of the reform of 2007: from the ECHR Judgment "Arribas Antón" to the present time; 4. Balance of the application of the reform of 2007 ten years after its promulgation; 5. Deception of the justiciables; 6. Possible improvements.
Reference Key
snchez2018revistaqu Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Pedro Julio Tenorio Sánchez
Journal international journal of refugee law
Year 2018
DOI
10.5944/rdp.101.2018.21976
URL
http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/derechopolitico/article/view/21976
Keywords
jurisprudence comparative and uniform law

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.