tutela coletiva: crítica às propostas de sua codificação processual no brasil

Clicks: 49
ID: 224650
2007
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #58 of 74 articles by views in green chemistry

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Partindo do direito romano clássicocomo contraponto, criticam-se as propostas decodificação do direito processual coletivo, emdebate no Brasil, posto limitarem-se à categoriados interesses transindividuais, sem romper,verdadeiramente, com a dicotomia público/privadoe sem transpor o âmbito do processo civiltradicional. Propõe-se o desenho do direito coletivoda pós-modernidade, mediante o resgateda lide real (em oposição à lide formal e fragmentadado processo da modernidade), o queimplica a dimensão: de direito material, com oreconhecimento da autonomia dos direitos coletivos(tais como ambiente, saúde e cultura emdeterminados contextos); da subjetividade coletiva(em contrapartida às limitações da categoriade interesses transindividuais); do processocoletivo, em termos de ágora (no lugar doprocesso legalista e formalista e competitivotradicional).Starting from the classic Roman rightas counterpoint, coding proposals of theprocedural collective right, which are under debatein Brazil, are criticized, since they are limitedwithin the transindividual interests category,without breaking, in fact, with the dichotomypublic/private, and without transposing the scopeof the traditional civil process. It is proposed thedrawing of the collective right from the postmodernity,through the recovery of the real deal(in opposition to the formal and fragmented dealfrom the modernity process), which means thedimension: of material right with the recognitionof the autonomy of collective rights (such asenvironment, health and culture in certaincontexts); of the collective subjectivity (in returnto the limitations of the transindividual interestscategory); of the collective process, in terms ofAgora (in legalistic and formalistic process’s andtraditional competitive process’s place).
Reference Key
pilati2007sequncia:tutela Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;José Isaac Pilati
Journal green chemistry
Year 2007
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/15051
Keywords
jurisprudence comparative and uniform law public civil actionlawlaw in general

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.