estudo comparativo da autonomia de ação de idosas praticantes e não praticantes de exercícios físicos regulares comparative study on the autonomy of female elderly practitioners and non-practitioners of regular physical exercises

Clicks: 285
ID: 224629
2010
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #21 of 73 articles by views in research disclosure

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
A prática regular de exercícios físicos pode afetar favoravelmente a autonomia. O estudo comparou a autonomia de ação de idosas praticantes (GE, n = 27) e não praticantes (GNE, n = 21) de exercícios, valendo-se do Sistema Sênior de Avaliação da Autonomia de Ação (SysSen). O SysSen é composto por questionário (QSAP), voltado para necessidades de potência aeróbia (PA) e força (FO) em atividades compatíveis com uma vida percebida como autônoma, e teste de campo (TSMP), no qual se caminha 800m transportando cargas predeterminadas. O QSAP fornece o índice de autonomia exprimida (IAE) e o TSMP o índice de autonomia potencial (IAP) que, cruzados, definem o índice de autonomia de ação (IAP/IAE = ISAC). Um ISAC > 1,0 caracteriza o sujeito como autônomo. Os grupos eram similares quanto à idade (GNE = 68 ± 5 vs. GE = 69 ± 6 anos; p = 0,56), peso (GNE = 65,7 ± 14,6 vs. GE = 67,4 ± 10,1kg; p = 0,65) e estatura (GNE = 1,54 ± 0,05 vs. GE = 1,56 ± 0,04m; p = 0,28). Houve diferenças significativas para o tempo de execução do TSMP (GNE = 678,9 ± 78,0 vs. GE = 631,0 ± 91,1s; p = 0,05) e IAP (GNE = 64,4 ± 5,2 vs. GE = 68,2 ± 4,7; p = 0,01). No tocante ao QSAP, não se constataram diferenças significativas para o IAE (GNE = 73,3 ± 57,0 vs. GE = 73,7 ± 5,1; p = 0,85) ou necessidades de FO e PA. Todavia, os resultados para PA e FO foram maiores para GE nos itens relacionados às atividades que as idosas faziam efetivamente (p < 0,05). Não houve diferença entre os grupos para o ISAC (p = 0,55). Conclui-se que a prática regular de exercícios não influenciou significativamente a autonomia de ação apreciada pelo SysSen, provavelmente em virtude de elevação proporcional do IAE e IAP nos grupos ativo e inativo.
Regular exercise practice is favorably related with functional autonomy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the physical activity level influences on the results of the Senior System for Assessment of Action Autonomy (SysSen) in elderly women. The SysSen is composed of a questionnaire (QSAP) focusing on the needs of aerobic power (AP) and upper limb strength (S) for a life perceived as autonomous, and a field test (TSMP), in which the subject walks 800m carrying pre-set loads. The QSAP provides the Expressed Autonomy Index (EAI) and the TSMP, the Potential Autonomy Index (PAI). The ratio between EAI and PAI defines the Autonomy of Action Index (PAI/EAI = AAI). An AAIof 1.0 or more characterizes the subject as independent. The subjects were either assigned to physically active (EG, n = 27) or non-active groups (NEG, n = 21), which were similar in age (NEG = 68 ± 5 vs EG = 69 ± 6 years; p = 0.56), weight (NEG = 65.7± 14.6 vs EG= 67.4± 10.1 kg; p = 0.65), and height (NEG = 1.54 ± 0.05 vs EG = 1.56 ± 0.04 m; p = 0.28). No differences were found for the EAI (NEG 73.3 ± 57.0 vs EG= 73.7± 5.1; p = 0.85) or needs related to AP and S. However, the results for AP and S in EG were higher in the items concerned with the activities daily performed (p < .05). The AAI was statistically similar across the groups (p = 0.55). In conclusion, regular exercise practice did not influence on the action autonomy as appreciated by the SysSen, probably due to a proportional increase of EAI and PAI in the active and inactive groups.
Reference Key
perez2010revistaestudo Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Anselmo José Perez;Otávio Tavares;Flor Bonadiman Fusi;Gabriela Linhares Daltio;Paulo de Tarso Veras Farinatti
Journal research disclosure
Year 2010
DOI
10.1590/S1517-86922010000400004
URL
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922010000400004
Keywords
aging autonomy physical activity physical fitness envelhecimento saúde atividade física

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.