apex of russian society early xx century and formation of ideas monarchical
Clicks: 103
ID: 223711
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
103 views
17 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #87 of 153 articles by views in ifmbe proceedings
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 153 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Activity of Russian monarchist parties of beginning of ХХ of century is the most investigated theme in Russian Federation. In Ukraine she does not have such demand, that is why becomes more actual.
In the article examined or identical concepts “monarchists” and “chornosotentsi”. Researches of works of the modern Russian historians and eyewitnesses of events of beginning of ХХ of century confirm, that these concepts are identical.
The authors of the programs of monarchist parties and most active participants of events in the Russian empire of beginning of ХХ of century was an apex of Russian society. The most wellknown theorists were К. Pobedonostsev and L. Tichomirov. Their activity on the field of monarchism it is retreat from their previous ideas liberalism and populism (“Earth and will”). Is it possible to consider them renegades? If they were ordinary figures, then it can be perceived as нерозуміння, as an error, as a search of new ideas and others like that.
But these were persons that held leading positions in liberal and populist parties and very well understood maintenance of ideas, and that they did.
Exactly the ideas of К. Побєдоносцева and Л. of Тихомирова became basis of programmatic requirements of monarchists.
Ukrainian political subculture with monarchist does not coincide practically. They are alike only in one point Orthodox identity.
| Reference Key |
yakunin2014granapex
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;A. O. Yakuninа |
| Journal | ifmbe proceedings |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.