analysis of classical time-trial performance and technique-specific physiological determinants in elite female cross-country skiers
Clicks: 109
ID: 223521
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
108 views
7 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The present study investigated the contribution of performance on uphill, flat, and downhill sections to overall performance in an international 10-km classical time-trial in elite female cross-country skiers, as well as the relationships between performance on snow and laboratory-measured physiological variables in the double poling (DP) and diagonal (DIA) techniques. Ten elite female cross-country skiers were continuously measured by a global positioning system device during an international 10-km cross-country skiing time-trial in the classical technique. One month prior to the race, all skiers performed a 5-min submaximal and 3-min self-paced performance test while roller skiing on a treadmill, both in the DP and DIA techniques. The time spent on uphill (r=0.98) and flat (r=0.91) sections of the race correlated most strongly with the overall 10-km performance (both p<0.05). Approximately 56% of the racing time was spent uphill, and stepwise multiple regression revealed that uphill time explained 95.5% of the variance in overall performance (p<0.001). Distance covered during the 3-min roller-skiing test and body-mass normalized peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in both techniques showed the strongest correlations with overall time-trial performance (r=0.66-0.78), with DP capacity tending to have greatest impact on the flat and DIA capacity on uphill terrain (all p<0.05). Our present findings reveal that the time spent uphill most strongly determine classical time-trial performance, and that the major portion of the performance differences among elite female cross-country skiers can be explained by variations in technique-specific aerobic power.
| Reference Key |
sandbakk2016frontiersanalysis
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Øyvind Sandbakk;Thomas Losnegard;Øyvind Skattebo;Ann Magdalen Hegge;Espen Tønnessen;Espen Tønnessen;Jan Kocbach |
| Journal | Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fphys.2016.00326
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.