Governmental Illegitimacy and Incompetency in Canada and Other Liberal Nations: Implications for Health.
Clicks: 285
ID: 22311
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
77.7
/100
279 views
226 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The welfare state literature on developing nations is concerned with how governmental illegitimacy and incompetency are the sources of inequality, exploitation, exclusion, and domination of significant proportions of their citizenry. These dimensions clearly contribute to the problematic health outcomes in these nations. In contrast, developed nations are assumed to grapple with less contentious issues of stratification, decommodification, and the relative role of the state, market, and family in providing economic and social security, also important pathways to health. There is an explicit assumption that governing authorities in developed nations are legitimate and competent such that their citizens are not systematically subjected to inequality, exploitation, exclusion, and domination by elites. In this article, we argue that these concepts should also be the focus of welfare state analysis in developed liberal welfare states such as Canada. Such an analysis would expose how public policy is increasingly being made in the service of powerful economic elites rather than the majority, thereby threatening health. It would also serve to identify means of responding to these developments.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (172 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
raphael2019governmentalinternational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Raphael, Dennis;Komakech, Morris;Bryant, Toba;Torrence, Ryan; |
| Journal | international journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1177/0020731418795136
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.