portuguese cultural adaptation and validation of the activities scale for kids (ask),
Clicks: 214
ID: 222836
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
214 views
44 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #68 of 117 articles by views in sports (basel, switzerland)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Objectives: The main purpose of the current study was to perform the cross cultural adaptation and validation of the Activities Scale for Kids (ASK) both in its capability and performance versions to the European Portuguese language so it can be used in Portugal by healthcare professionals in children from 5 to 15 years of age with functional disabilities related to specific health conditions. Methods: The cross-cultural adaptation of ASK followed the classic sequential methodology for linguistic equivalence. To test its validity, internal consistency, and reproducibility, the Portuguese version of ASK was administered together with the KINDL Questionnaire (KINDL) to 88 children (10 ± 3 years of age) with functional limitations. The test–retest study was conducted two weeks apart. Results: After obtaining the semantic and content validity, the Portuguese version of ASK demonstrated good levels of reproducibility (performance: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.99; capability: ICC = 0.98) and internal consistency (performance: α = 0.98; capability: α = 0.97). The correlations between ASK and KINDL were positive and moderate. Conclusions: The Portuguese version of ASK showed acceptable levels of validity, internal consistency, and reproducibility; the authors recommend its use in clinical settings.
| Reference Key |
paixo2016jornalportuguese
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Daniela Paixão;Luís Manuel Cavalheiro;Rui Soles Gonçalves;Pedro Lopes Ferreira |
| Journal | sports (basel, switzerland) |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.jped.2015.09.010
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.