a plaintiff’s prior complaint substantive and formal requirements

Clicks: 6
ID: 222540
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #27 of 28 articles by views in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The requirements related to contend of a prior complaint consider, as case may be, the attribute of representing a requirement of punishment likelihood or of that of legal proceedings. The text of art. 283 Code of Criminal Procedure on the contends of prior complaint, states its elements which we intend to examine so that we may consider whether or not a prior complaint is properly filled in and what are the consequences of any irregularities. The legal efficacy of any prior complaint is therefore determined by its contends and this is why some of the elements specified below are provided under the penalty of being considered null and void, their deficiency thus attracting the legal inefficiency of the prior complaint, being considered a null document or, as some scholars may point out, as inexistent.
Reference Key
chiril2009actaa Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Angelica CHIRILĂ
Journal Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)
Year 2009
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.