Paired and Group Oral Assessment

Clicks: 78
ID: 22099
2015
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #13 of 13 articles by views in working papers in applied linguistics and tesol

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The assessment of second language (L2) speaking has long been an important yet challenging area of research in language testing. L2 testers are often concerned with designing authentic speaking tasks that resemble real-life speaking activities so that score interpretations are generalizable to non-test contexts. The conversational nature of speaking skills has promoted the widespread integration of more authentic and interactive assessment tasks, such as paired or group orals. Such direct test formats typically involve candidates interacting together to perform a task while one or more examiners observe their performances and rate their language proficiency (Van Moere, 2013, p. 1).
Reference Key
sun2015pairedworking Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sun, Haimei;
Journal working papers in applied linguistics and tesol
Year 2015
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D85D93NW/download
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.