accurate completion of medical report on diagnosing death
Clicks: 21
ID: 220904
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
6.0
/100
21 views
8 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #91 of 96 articles by views in Journal of Asian natural products research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Diagnosing death and issuing a Death Diagnosing Form (DDF) represents an
activity that carries a great deal of public responsibility for medical
professionals of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and is perpetually
exposed to the control of the general public. Diagnosing death is necessary
so as to confirm true, to exclude apparent death and consequentially to avoid
burying a person alive, i.e. apparently dead. These expert-methodological
guidelines based on the most up-to-date and medically based evidence have the
goal of helping the physicians of the EMS in accurately filling out a medical
report on diagnosing death. If the outcome of applied cardiopulmonary
resuscitation measures is negative or when the person is found dead, the
physician is under obligation to diagnose death and correctly fill out the
DDF. It is also recommended to perform electrocardiography (EKG) and record
asystole in at least two leads. In the process of diagnostics and treatment,
it is a moral obligation of each Belgrade EMS physician to apply all
available achievements and knowledge of modern medicine acquired from
extensive international studies, which have been indeed the major theoretical
basis for the creation of these expert-methodological guidelines. Those
acting differently do so in accordance with their conscience and risk
professional, and even criminal sanctions.
| Reference Key |
slobodan2015srpskiaccurate
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Savić Slobodan;Alempijević Đorđe;Anđelić Slađana |
| Journal | Journal of Asian natural products research |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.2298/SARH1512763S
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.