otrā un trešā konjugācija agrākajās latviešu gramatikās
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #110 of 195 articles by views in current pharmaceutical biotechnology
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 195 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
THE SECOND AND THIRD CONJUGATIONS IN THE EARLIEST LATVIAN GRAMMARS
Summary
The earliest writers on Latvian inherited much of their framework from Latin, but many questions required independent empirical analysis, especially in verb morphology. The present tense contrast between dzied-u and strād-āju proved particularly troublesome.
Rehehusen (1644) seems to have been hardly aware of the problem. Büchner (c. 1670) did little more than note the two types. Langius (1685) did not refer to the problem at all. Dreszell (1685) recognized the distinction between monosyllabic and polysyllabic infinitives, but his treatment of polysyllables was highly confused. Adolphi (1685) provided the first extensive treatment, but yet left many details unresolved. The „Dispositio imperfecti...“ (1732) offered a new theoretical approach in which the present (not the infinitive) serves as the starting-point, but this innovation, both in practice and in theory, proved to be unworkable. The next grammar, "Lotavica Gram-matica” (1737), reverted to a re-statement of Adolphi’s views.
It is only with Stender (1761), who, ironically, expressed grave doubts about the organization of polysyllables, that further real progress is made. His description is inferior to the modern theory in minor respects only. His work stands as the culmination of the first phase of research on the Latvian verb.
| Reference Key |
fennell2011baltisticaotr
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Trevor G. Fennell |
| Journal | current pharmaceutical biotechnology |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
10.15388/baltistica.0.3.2.845
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.