nach dem ‚narrative turn‘. handbücher und lexika des 21. jahrhunderts
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #21 of 21 articles by views in cardiology journal
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
Recent years have seen the appearance of numerous lexica and handbooks de-voted to general narratological questions which collect contributions from dif-ferent disciplines. What are the strengths and weaknesses of these books (each of which is aimed at a large readership)? What kind of knowledge is provided, and what understanding of narratology is codified, in these works? This contri-bution approaches these questions in the form of an overview, and arrives at the following conclusion: If narratology is to become a truly transdisciplinary pro-ject, genuine theoretical and methodological exchange between neighboring dis-ciplines needs to be intensified. After the period of expansion in research fields and the current phase of consolidation (as documented in such handbooks and lexica), a closer focus on transdisciplinary collaboration would mark a new step in the development of narratological research.
| Reference Key |
scheffel2012diegesis:nach
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Michael Scheffel |
| Journal | cardiology journal |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.